Plastic Surgery for Men QT: What causes facial wasting and what plastic surgery methods are available for facial improvement?

Fat wasting or fat loss from the face is one of the characteristics of lipodystrophy which is a syndrome of body fat changes seen in people taking anti-HIV medications.. Wasting of fat in the face usually occurs with other changes in body shape particularly the development of a buffalo hump on the back of the neck. Nobody knows exactly why fat from the faces specifically goes away on people taking anti-HIV drugs, but a significant percentage of such patients will experience it depending on their particular retroviral medication regimens. It seems to occur particularly in men of low body weight who are over the age of forty.

Facial wasting can present in a variety of appearances from subtle to very dramatic, based on the amount of fat under the skin that has been lost. Patients typically present with sunken-in cheeks, very prominent cheek bones not covered by the usual fat layer, and hollow temples. This also creates loose facial skin due to the lack of underlying fullness.

Facial wasting can be treated by a variety of plastic surgery methods. The most popularized is the injectable approach using Sculptra or other long-lasting fillers such as Radiesse. While injectable fillers definitely provide a benefit, I don’t find them to be the best value, given what they cost and the repeated treatment sessions necessary. In my experience, several surgical options are more effective with injectable fillers used to supplement them.

I find that cheek implants, specifically submalar implants, are the best first approach for facial improvement. These implants come in a wide variety of shapes and sizes so some customization of them can be done for each patient. These implants provide a good fill of the lost volume of the buccal fat pad and are easy to place through an incision inside the mouth. Once in the proper position, I prefer to place a screw through them to hold them permanently to the underlying cheek bone. There is some mild swelling after surgery but one can go back to work and resume all normal activities within just a few days. The advantage of an implant is that its volume will remain stable over time unlike injectable fillers. I have yet to experience any infections with cheek implants in the HIV patient nor do I think they are at any great increased infection rate from plastic surgery in general.

Injectable fillers can be used to fill in around the edges of the implants later. Often there can be a step-off or obvious demarcation from the implant to the surrounding skin in cases where the facial wasting is quite severe. In more mild cases, this is not necessary.

When the facial wasting is associated with loose skin, a modified facelift can also be very helpful. Changing the facelift to more of a jowl-neck tuck-up helps stretch out the loose cheek and facial skin. When done in combination with submalar cheek implants, some really nice facial improvements can be achieved.
resource: http://www.plasticsurgeryfacial.com/facial-plastic-surgery-articles/facial-wasting-
plastic-surgery-correction/